Private Trust Company Structures: Ownership, Regulation and the Orphan Problem

What a Private Trust Company Actually Is

A PTC and a professional or licensed trustee have several principal differences:

• Restricted Client Base: a private trust company operates as a trustee only for a specific trust or group of connected trusts and generally does not offer its services to other entities or the public.
• Family-Controlled Governance: typically, the board of a PTC includes family members, trusted advisors, and at least one independent professional director.
• Purpose-Limited Constitution: its memorandum and articles (or operating agreement, for an LLC) restrict it to acting as trustee, protector or administrator of trusts, and to activities ancillary to that role.

The PTC holds the trust assets as trustee and provides beneficiaries with a full range of fiduciary services. When a family incorporates a PTC, it relocates legal ownership and certain decision making functions while maintaining a degree of practical control over their assets through governance and reserved powers.

How Different Jurisdictions Apply Licensing Requirements to a PTC

Various jurisdictions apply their own set of requirements for private trust company formation.

Thus, the Cayman Islands requires a PTC to register with the local regulator and pay an annual fee. A Bahamian PTC must appoint a licensed registered representative. A British Virgin Islands PTC enjoys a statutory exemption but only while it satisfies a defined set of conditions, and forfeits the exemption the moment it does not. By contrast, a Nevis PTC is exempt from licensing requirements  because the activity it carries on does not meet the statutory definition of regulated trust business.

What Are the Ownership Requirements Applicable to a PTC

Structuring ownership can make it or break it for a private trust company. A PTC is a company that has shareholders whose identity determines whether the PTC structure can serve its purpose.

If structured improperly, the PTC shares can be considered part of the settlor’s estate. A court may conclude that the settlor of a PTC never gave up control of the trust’s assets and exposed them to creditors’ demand. This so-called orphan problem requires careful structuring of a PTC and is addressed in the second half of this article.

Why Families Use a PTC Rather than a Licensed Trustee

Control Over Concentrated and Illiquid Assets

One of the main reasons why families choose to create a PTC is to have a dedicated entity for handling trust’s assets and limiting their risk exposure. As it was demonstrated by court practice, a professional trustee that holds a controlling stake in a single operating business may face risks and liabilities leading to unwanted exposure. In a landmark case, Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (No 1) [1980] Ch 515, a corporate trustee holding a controlling shareholding was held liable for failing to supervise the underlying company’s board, having treated itself as a passive shareholder, and lost heavily when speculative property development went wrong.

The market response was the anti-Bartlett clause, seeking to limit the trustee’s duty to intervene in the affairs of underlying companies. The efficacy of those clauses was tested in Zhang Hong Li v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd (2019) 22 HKCFAR 392, where the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ultimately upheld the trustee’s protection, reversing the lower courts. That said, the litigation was expensive and protracted, highlighting the risks faced by professional trustees.

As a result, many institutional trustees may simply decline to hold a family business, a concentrated single-stock position, a yacht, an aircraft, a private equity portfolio or a digital asset holding. Where a professional trustee will accept such assets, it will often insist on indemnities, reserved powers, external valuations and delays that  most owners may find intolerable. In contrast, a PTC whose board understands the asset can act at commercial speed.

Continuity and Cost

Unlike an individual trustee who can resign, lose capacity, or pass away, a PTC has perpetual succession. Meanwhile, the cost of a PTC structure can be lower than the fees of professional trustees, calculated on the value of assets in their administration, depending on the size and complexity of the structure and the jurisdiction.

Governance Architecture

Forming a PTC provides a perfect opportunity to structure family governance through defining appointment of board members, forming a committee for investment and distribution decisions, and introducing the next generation.

Is a Private Trust Company Regulated? Three Jurisdictional Models

Generally, offshore jurisdictions offering private trust company formation fall into three broad categories. These categories vary by the applicable requirements for disclosure, identity of the required local service provider as well as by consequences of poor structuring and annual costs.

Model 1: Registration with the Regulator

Cayman Islands

Section 6 of the Banks and Trust Companies Act (2025 Revision) prohibits any person from carrying on trust business in or from within the Islands without a licence. Meanwhile, the Private Trust Companies Regulations (2020 Revision), as amended, permit a PTC to escape that requirement by registering with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. To qualify, the company must be incorporated under the Companies Act, conduct only “connected trust business” as defined in the Regulations, maintain its registered office with a holder of a full trust licence, include “Private Trust Company” or “PTC” in its registered name, and refrain from soliciting contributions from the public. For an unregistered PTC, at least one director must be a natural person. Registration and annual fees apply, and any change to the information filed must be notified to CIMA within 30 days.

The Bahamas

The Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act and the Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies) Regulations, 2007 allow forming a PTC exempt from the full licensing requirements of the Act. That said, such a Bahamian PTC will be subject to continuing Central Bank oversight through a mandatory registered representative, which is usually a Bahamian licensed bank, trust company or other approved entity that maintains the PTC’s records, holds the share register and reports to the Central Bank. The regime was consolidated and modernised by the Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies and Qualified Executive Entities) Regulations, 2025, gazetted on 5 September 2025, which brought PTCs and executive entities within a single instrument.

Model 2: Statutory Exemption on Conditions

British Virgin Islands

Section 3 of the Banks and Trust Companies Act, 1990 makes it an offence to carry on trust business from within the BVI without a licence. Meanwhile, the Financial Services (Exemptions) Regulations, 2007 (as amended, including in 2013 and 2021) offer an exception for a company which:

• is a BVI business company limited by shares or by guarantee;
• carries on no business other than acting as trustee, protector or administrator of trusts, and business ancillary to it;
• does not solicit trust business from the public;
• maintains a registered agent holding a Class I trust licence under the 1990 Act; and
• conducts trust business consisting solely of “unremunerated trust business”, “related trust business”, or a combination of the two.

In the context of the exemption, the “unremunerated trust business” means trust business for which no remuneration is payable to, or received by, the PTC or any person associated with it. “Related trust business” means business in respect of a qualifying trust, or a group of related qualifying trusts, for example, where every beneficiary is the settlor, a person connected to the settlor by blood, marriage or adoption, or a charity. This exemption allows a BVI trust to be managed by the local PTC.

The BVI Business Companies (Company Names) Regulations, 2007 require the name to end with the designation “(PTC)” immediately before the corporate suffix. Additionally, the 1990 Act prohibits the use of “trust”, “trustee”, “trust company”, “trust corporation” or “fiduciary” in the name. If the conditions cease to be satisfied, the exemption can be rescinded and trust licence requirements would apply.

Jersey, Channel Islands

Article 7 of the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 requires entities to implement formal registration to carry on trust company business. Meanwhile, paragraph 4 of the Schedule to the Financial Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions)) (Jersey) Order 2000 exempts a company

• whose purpose is solely to provide trust company business services in respect of a specific trust or trusts,
• which does not solicit from or provide services to the public, and
• whose administration is carried out by a registered person registered to carry on trust company business, whose name has been notified to the Jersey Financial Services Commission.

The registration framework is therefore preserved indirectly: the PTC is unregistered, but the administrator behind it is fully regulated. Guernsey, another Channel Island jurisdiction, adopts a comparable approach under its fiduciary licensing legislation.

Singapore. Section 15 of the Trust Companies Act 2005 and the Trust Companies (Exemption) Regulations exempt a PTC from the requirement to hold a trust business licence, provided it delivers trust services solely to “connected persons” as defined and does not solicit from the public. At the same time, Regulation 4(2) requires the PTC to engage a licensed trust company to carry out trust administration services for the purpose of the anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism checks mandated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Model 3: Absence of Registration Requirements

Currently, among main jurisdictions, Nevis remains the only one which does not apply formal registration requirements for private trust company formation. Because Nevis’s Trust and Corporate Service Providers Ordinance, 2021, defines trust business as activity carried on for profit or reward, a properly structured PTC is treated as not carrying on regulated trust business at all, so no trust licence, exemption, or PTC registration is required.

Nevis Private Trust Company Formation

The Statutory Gateway: NIETO Section 2

The Nevis International Exempt Trust Ordinance, Cap. 7.03 (N) (“NIETO”) defines an “international trust” as a trust registered under the Ordinance in respect of which:

(A) at least one of the trustees is either:

• a corporation incorporated under the Nevis Business Corporation Ordinance, Cap. 7.01 (N);
• a limited liability company formed under the Nevis Limited Liability Company Ordinance, Cap. 7.04 (N);
• a trust company licensed in Nevis;
• an attorney-at-law or firm of attorneys-at-law duly licensed by the Nevis Island Administration to carry on the business of a registered agent; or
• a multiform foundation established and registered under the Multiform Foundations Ordinance, Cap. 7.08 (N);

(B) the settlor and beneficiaries are at all times non-resident; and

(C) the trust property does not include any real property situated in St. Christopher and Nevis.

The language of the ordinance allows an unlicensed Nevis Business Corporation and Nevis LLC to become a trustee in an international trust. This makes Nevis a unique jurisdiction for private trust company formation with no licensing requirements for this purpose.

The Licensing Framework: the TCSP Ordinance 2021

At the same time, trust and corporate services in Nevis are regulated under the Nevis Trust and Corporate Service Providers Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance No. 2 of 2021), brought into force on 1 May 2021 by S.R.O. 4 of 2021 and administered by the Nevis Financial Services Regulatory Commission. Section 7(1) of TCSP ordinance provides that no person shall carry on any regulated activity, or hold themselves out as carrying on such activity, in or from within Nevis without a valid licence.

The critical drafting is in the definition. Section 2 defines “trust business” by reference to the activities set out in section 6 of the Ordinance carried on for profit or reward. Accordingly, the TCSP Ordinance is triggered by the commercial character of the activity, not by the bare fact of acting as trustee.

If a Private Trust Company acts as trustee for a single family, takes no remuneration from unconnected persons, does not market trustee services, and does not hold itself out as a trust services provider, than it is not carrying on trust business within the meaning of section 2. In this case, no license requirement is present for the trustee, and no exemption is needed.

Generally, the Commission issues two licence classes for Nevis businesses. A Class I licence covers formation agency, registered agent and registered office services for corporations, LLCs and foundations, and the provision of directors, shareholders, officers, managers, members and foundation board members. A Class II licence may be restricted or unrestricted; the restricted form covers registration and registered office services for trusts only, while the unrestricted form additionally permits trust business. When a PTC starts offering trustee services for profit or reward, it will need the Class II unrestricted licence.

Where the Line Is Crossed

The exposure to licensing requirements is not theoretical. A Nevis PTC may be subject to licensing requirements if it:

• charges fees for acting as trustee for settlors outside the family or connected group;
• accepts appointment as trustee for unrelated third parties;
• markets, advertises or otherwise holds itself out as offering trustee services; or
• otherwise provides section 6 activities for profit or reward.

In real life it is not uncommon for structures to drift. A PTC formed for one family that gradually accepts trusts for business partners, in-laws outside the defined connected class, or co-investors may fall under licensing requirements, usually without anyone noticing. In these cases, an unrestricted application for Class II license, accompanied by assessment of principals, minimum paid-in capital and audited financial statements, becomes a way out although it is more challenging than getting the constitutional documents for such cases right at inception.

What a Nevis PTC Still Has to Do

While a Nevis PTC can be exempt from licensing if structured correctly, it must comply with other statutory requirements including:

Registered agent

As a Nevis corporation or LLC, a PTC must maintain a registered agent licensed under the TCSP Ordinance. In Nevis, private trust company formation is only possible through a licensed provider using the Corporate Registry Integrated Secure System.

Registered office of the trust

A Nevis private trust company must have a registered office. Under NIETO s.48(1), the registered office of the international trust is the office of the corporation, LLC, foundation or attorney acting as trustee.

Trust registration and renewal

Sections 43 and 44 require registration with the Registrar and annual renewal. The registration and annual fees are each EC$594 (US$220), with renewal to be applied for no later than 90 days after expiry. Failure to renew the registration may lead to striking the PTC off the register, paying penalties and having to reinstate the company.

Books of account

Section 42 obliges the trustee to keep proper books of account, including underlying contracts and invoices, preserved for a minimum of five years, sufficient to determine the financial position of the trust at any time and to permit financial statements to be prepared. Knowing and wilful non-compliance with this requirement attracts a penalty of $5,000.

Trustee number

Except for charitable purpose trusts, section 36(4) caps the number of trustees at four. In cases involving a larger number of trustees, only the first four are considered.

Corporate trustee mechanics

Section 41 confirms that a corporate, LLC or multiform foundation trustee may act through its board of directors, board of managers or other governing body. Additionally, the PTC structure may appoint an officer, employee or agent to act on its behalf and implement board resolutions.

The Nevis Protective Overlay

As a trustee of a Nevis trust, a PTC registered in the island enjoys protection provided by the NIETO, considered one of the robust frameworks worldwide:

Fraudulent disposition

• Sections 26(1) and 26(7) of the Ordinance require a creditor to prove intent to defraud beyond reasonable doubt and place the burden squarely on the creditor.
• Section 50(1) bars any action to set aside a settlement or disposition, or against a trustee for breach of trust, commenced more than two years from the relevant date.

Foreign judgments

• Section 30 of the Ordinance explicitly bars enforcement or recognition proceedings of foreign judgments that are inconsistent with Nevis law. In such cases, a creditor must start new litigation in Nevis.
• Section 54 prevents any challenge founded on forced heirship rights.

Security for costs

According to Section 61, a creditor seeking to bring any action against trust property must deposit a bond of EC$270,000 (approximately US$100,000) with the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Finance from a Nevis financial institution.

Reserved powers

• Section 53(1) provides an unusually generous list of powers the settlor may retain without the trust being declared invalid, including revocation, veto over distributions, amendment, removal and appointment of trustees and protectors, the power to direct the trustee on any matter, and the ability to act as investment adviser. On top of that, the settlor may be the sole beneficiary of the trust.
• Section 46 closes the register to disclosure except by authorisation of the trustee. Meanwhile, Section 63 applies the Confidential Relationships Act, Cap. 21.02 and requires non-criminal proceedings to be heard in camera.
• Section 49 exempts registered trusts from income tax, estate, inheritance, succession and gift tax, stamp duty and exchange controls.

The Multiform Foundation: a Nevis Peculiarity

Sub-paragraph (v) of the NIETO section 2 definition permits a multiform foundation registered under the Multiform Foundations Ordinance, Cap. 7.08 (N) to act as a qualifying trustee in its own right. Nevis is one of very few jurisdictions in which a foundation, which is an ownerless entity with no shares and no members, can itself be the trustee, rather than merely the vehicle that owns the trustee company.

That collapses two layers into one and removes a conceptual obstacle for families whose advisers are more comfortable with civil law foundations than with common law trusts. It is also directly relevant to the orphan problem discussed next.

Who Owns a Private Trust Company? The Orphan Problem

Since a PTC is a company, someone must hold its shares or membership interests. Structuring ownership in a PTC is critical to avoid exposure for the settlor and ensure compliance.

Why Settlors Should Avoid Holding Shares in a PTC

If the settlor owns the PTC shares personally, it can trigger the following consequences:

• The shares form part of the settlor’s estate on death, exposing the entire structure to probate, forced heirship claims and estate taxation in the settlor’s jurisdiction of domicile.
• The shares in a PTC can become an attachable asset, passing the control of the trustee to the creditors.
• A court examining whether the settlor genuinely divested himself of the trust property may obtain evidence that the settlor in fact retained control of the trustee. That is precisely the factual pattern that supports a sham or illusory trust finding.

The solution to these is to make the PTC an “orphan,” owned by an entity with no beneficial owner whose interests could be attacked or inherited.

Option 1: Non-Charitable Purpose Trust

Ownership of PTC shares by a non-charitable purpose trust is a classic solution. In this arrangement, the PTC shares are settled on a trust designed to achieve a specific purpose which is holding shares in the PTC and ensuring its proper administration.

In Nevis, Section 8 of NIETO permits an international trust for a non-charitable purpose provided the purpose is specific, reasonable and capable of fulfilment, is not immoral, unlawful or contrary to public policy, and the terms provide for a protector capable of enforcing the trust together with a successor. Accordingly, Nevis vests the enforcement power in the protector rather than on a separately named enforcer.

In the British Virgin Islands, the vehicle of choice is a trust governed by the Virgin Islands Special Trusts Act (VISTA). VISTA removes the prudent-investor duty in relation to designated shares and prohibits the trustee from intervening in the affairs of the underlying company except on a permitted application by an interested party. In the Cayman Islands, the equivalent is a STAR trust under Part VIII of the Trusts Act, which requires the appointment of an enforcer distinct from the trustee.

Option 2: Foundation

A foundation has no shares and no members and is an “orphan” by construction, which removes the need for a purpose trust layer. Here is how various jurisdictions regulate using foundation for the purpose of private trust company formation.

• Nevis. Multiform Foundations Ordinance, Cap. 7.08 (N) allows a Nevis multiform foundation to take the character of a trust, company, partnership or foundation, and act as trustee directly under NIETO s.2(a)(v).
• Private Interest Foundation under Law 25 of 12 June 1995 regulates the creation of foundations that may act as a trustee.
• Cayman Islands. Foundation company under the Foundation Companies Act, 2017, may dispense with members entirely.
• Foundation under the Foundations (Jersey) Law 2009, whose council must include a qualified member.
• Seychelles, Belize and Mauritius. Each of these jurisdictions offers foundations capable of holding PTC shares.

Option 3: Bahamian Executive Entity

There is a special Bahamas company named the Executive Entity, a legal person created to perform executive functions such as holding PTC shares, acting as protector or enforcer, or appointing and removing officeholders, making it capable of fulfilling this role without recourse to a purpose trust. The Bahamian Executive Entity is defined by the Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies and Qualified Executive Entities) Regulations, 2025 alongside the PTC regime itself.

Option 4: Charitable Trust or Professional Ownership

In this arrangement, shares may be settled on a charitable trust, or held by a licensed trust company on bare trust. While both of these routes could work, they introduce a third party with legal title to the trustee, which reintroduces some of the dependency families are trying to avoid.

What No Longer Works

Bearer shares and undisclosed nominee ownership are no longer viable. Every jurisdiction discussed above now maintains a beneficial ownership register accessible to relevant authorities, and the registered agent or registered representative is obliged to identify the natural persons ultimately controlling the PTC. In today’s disclosure realities, ownership must be structured to be defensible when disclosed, not concealed.

Governance: Where PTC Structures Fail

Regulatory compliance is the easier part. When PTC structures fail on governance, they may face liabilities when exposed to litigation.

Sham and Illusory Trusts

In JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank v Pugachev [2017] EWHC 2426 (Ch), Birss J examined five New Zealand trusts under which Mr Pugachev was protector with extensive powers. After reviewing the true construction of the deeds, the court held that the powers were personal rather than fiduciary, so that the trusts did not divest him of beneficial ownership; alternatively, they were shams. The decisive factor was the totality of retained control, evidenced by how the structure actually operated.

The earlier Jersey authority, Rahman v Chase Bank (CI) Trust Co Ltd [1991] JLR 103, reached a comparable conclusion where the settlor continued to deal with the trust fund as his own.

In turn, Clayton v Clayton [2016] NZSC 29 established the related illusory trust analysis, where the breadth of reserved powers means no trust arises at all.

The Tension with Reserved Powers Legislation

NIETO s.53 is deliberately expansive, and BVI (Trustee Act, s.86) and Cayman (Trusts Act, s.14) have comparable reserved-powers provisions. It is tempting to read those sections as immunising any degree of settlor control.

However, that reading is unsafe. Reserved-powers legislation protects the validity of the trust under the law of the trust’s jurisdiction. Meanwhile, it does not bind a foreign court asked to determine, under its own conflict rules and its own insolvency, matrimonial or tax legislation, whether the settlor retained beneficial ownership. Nor does it assist where the challenge is brought in the settlor’s home jurisdiction against the settlor personally.

The practical protection comes from an effective governance structure, for example:

• A board containing at least one director genuinely independent of the settlor.
• Minuted deliberation showing that trustee decisions were actually taken by the board.
• Conflicts of interest identified and managed where directors are also beneficiaries.
• A documented distribution process rather than instructions from the settlor implemented without consideration.
• Segregated trust accounting ensuring no commingling of trust assets with family assets.

A PTC that meets four times a year, considers the letter of wishes as guidance rather than instruction, records its reasoning and departs from the settlor’s preference at least occasionally is a very different structure. Evidentially, it stands apart from one whose minutes are prepared by an administrator.

Cross-Border Compliance Considerations

Automatic Exchange of Information

Under the Common Reporting Standard and FATCA, applicable to US-connected structures, the trust will generally be a Financial Institution where it is managed by another Financial Institution. In turn, the PTC may be classified as an Investment Entity depending on how it is administered and remunerated. Classification drives the reporting obligation and cannot be assumed; it should be determined in writing at inception and reviewed when the structure changes.

Economic Substance

A BVI Private Trust Company acting solely as trustee will not usually be carrying on a “relevant activity” under the BVI Economic Substance (Companies and Limited Partnerships) Act, 2018 or the Cayman International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act. The analysis is fact-sensitive, particularly where the PTC is remunerated, provides headquarters-type services to group entities, or where the underlying structure includes holding, financing or intellectual property activity. Notification obligations may apply even where no relevant activity is carried on.

Corporate Residence

A PTC incorporated in Nevis but whose board consistently meets and decides in a high-tax jurisdiction risks being treated as resident there under central management and control or place of effective management tests. Board composition and meeting location are substantive, not administrative, questions.

Home-Country Attribution

Controlled foreign company rules, settlor-attribution provisions and grantor trust rules in the settlor’s jurisdiction of residence operate independently of the trust’s governing law. Even Nevis’s protective legislation does not shield settlors from their application.

Private Trust Company Jurisdictions Compared

	Nevis	BVI	Cayman	Bahamas	Jersey	Singapore
Regulatory model	Outside perimeter	Exemption on conditions	Registration with CIMA	Registration + registered representative	Exemption on conditions	Exemption on conditions
Governing instrument	TCSP Ord. 2021; NIETO Cap. 7.03 (N)	BTCA 1990; Exemptions Regs 2007	BTCA (2025 Rev.); PTC Regs (2020 Rev., am. 2024)	BTCRA; PTC & QEE Regs 2025	FS (Jersey) Law 1998; Exemptions Order 2000	Trust Companies Act 2005 s.15; Exemption Regs
Regulator filing	None	None	Registration + 30-day change notification	Via registered representative	Name notified to JFSC	None
Mandatory local provider	Licensed TCSP as registered agent	Class I trust licensee as registered agent	Full trust licensee as registered office	Licensed registered representative	Registered TCB administrator	Licensed trust company for AML/CFT
Name designation	None required	“(PTC)” mandatory	“PTC” / “Private Trust Company”	None	None	None
Remuneration permitted	Not for profit/reward without licence	Only within “related trust business”	Within connected trust business	Within designated trusts	Not to the public	Connected persons only
Entity forms	NBC, LLC, multiform foundation	BVI BC ltd by shares/guarantee	Companies Act company	Companies Act or IBC Act company	Company	Private company

 

How to Set Up a Private Trust Company: Nine Steps

Step 1: Define the Connected Class

Align settlors and beneficiaries with the definition for connected or related persons applicable within your chosen jurisdiction, taking into account any future family members.

Step 2: Select the Jurisdiction for PTC formation

Analyze the jurisdictional treatment for assets involved, desired board location, cost tolerance, and degree of readiness for disclosure.

Step 3: Select the Ownership Vehicle

When incorporating a PTC, select an appropriate ownership vehicle, such as a purpose trust, foundation, or executive entity and ensure that the settlor never holds the shares, even briefly.

Step 4: Draft the constitutional documents

When drafting the constitutional documents, ensure they work as a genuine fence rather than a formality.

Step 5: Form the Board

Form the board, including at least one independent professional director, ensuring documented appointment and removal mechanics.

Step 6: Appoint the Local Service Provider

Select a registered agent, registered representative, or administrator depending on the jurisdictional requirements.

Step 7: Conduct Settlement

Settle the trusts. If you form a PTC in Nevis, register each trust under NIETO s.43 with a diarised annual renewal.

Step 8: Determine CRS/FATCA Classification

Document CRS/FATCA classification and economic substance position, in writing.

Step 9: Ensure Governance

Ensure meeting calendars and having  minute templates, a conflicts register, distribution policy, and accounting records that comply with the jurisdictions’ requirements, for example, NIETO s.42 in Nevis.

Table of Sources

Legislation — Saint Christopher and Nevis

• Nevis International Exempt Trust Ordinance, Cap. 7.03 (N) (Ordinance 1 of 1989; in force 1 May 1994; as amended by Ordinances 2 of 1995, 2 of 2000, 4 of 2009, 1 of 2011 and 2 of 2015), ss. 2, 8, 26, 30, 36, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 48, 49, 50, 53, 54, 55, 61, 63
• Nevis International Exempt Trust (Fees) Regulations (Second Schedule to Cap. 7.03 (N))
• Nevis Trust and Corporate Service Providers Ordinance, 2021 (Ordinance No. 2 of 2021), ss. 2, 5(3), 6, 7(1)
• Nevis Trust and Corporate Service Providers Ordinance (Commencement Notice) Order, 2021, S.R.O. 4 of 2021
• Nevis Business Corporation Ordinance, Cap. 7.01 (N)
• Nevis Limited Liability Company Ordinance, Cap. 7.04 (N)
• Multiform Foundations Ordinance, Cap. 7.08 (N)
• Confidential Relationships Act, Cap. 21.02
• Financial Services Regulatory Commission Act, ss. 35–37

Legislation — British Virgin Islands

• Banks and Trust Companies Act, 1990 (as amended), s. 3
• Financial Services (Exemptions) Regulations, 2007 (as amended)
• BVI Business Companies (Company Names) Regulations, 2007
• Virgin Islands Special Trusts Act, 2003 (as amended 2013)
• Trustee Act (Cap. 303), s. 86
• Economic Substance (Companies and Limited Partnerships) Act, 2018

Legislation — Cayman Islands

• Banks and Trust Companies Act (2025 Revision), s. 6
• Private Trust Companies Regulations (2020 Revision), as amended by the Private Trust Companies (Amendment) Regulations, 2024
• Trusts Act, Part VIII (STAR trusts); s. 14
• Foundation Companies Act, 2017
• International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act

Legislation — The Bahamas

• Banks and Trust Companies Regulation Act
• Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies) Regulations, 2007
• Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies and Qualified Executive Entities) Regulations, 2025 (gazetted 5 September 2025)

Legislation — Jersey, Singapore, Panama

• Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998, Arts. 2(4), 7
• Financial Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions)) (Jersey) Order 2000, Schedule, Part 1, para. 4
• Foundations (Jersey) Law 2009
• Trust Companies Act 2005 (Singapore), s. 15
• Trust Companies (Exemption) Regulations (Singapore), reg. 4(2)
• Law 25 of 12 June 1995 (Panama) — Private Interest Foundations

Case law

• Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (No 1) [1980] Ch 515
• Rahman v Chase Bank (CI) Trust Co Ltd [1991] JLR 103
• Clayton v Clayton [2016] NZSC 29
• JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank v Pugachev [2017] EWHC 2426 (Ch)
• Zhang Hong Li v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd (2019) 22 HKCFAR 392

Historical statute

• 13 Elizabeth I c.5 (1571) (Statute of Elizabeth)

This article is provided for general information and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Statutory references are to the legislation in force at the date of publication. Fee levels and regulatory requirements change; advice should be taken on the facts of any particular structure.